So here’s my final post for IBARW, which resulted from me storming around this morning thinking about all the things which piss me off. I’m sure you’re beside yourself with excitement.
I’ve spoken with a bunch of people lately about intersectionality, and I realize that not everyone is familiar with the concept. So just in case you haven’t been introduced, here’s a redacted Wikipedia quote about one part of what intersectionality is:
Intersectionality holds that the classical models of oppression within a society, such as those based on race/ethnicity; gender, religion, sexuality, class, disability and other markers of difference do not act independent of one another. Instead, these forms of oppression [interrelate].
When the intersectionality penny dropped for me (which pretty much consisted of me saying “Hey, Jane, what the hell is intersectionality?” and her in-depth answer), it opened up a whole new world. Because I care about all this stuff—racism, sexism, classism, anti-semitism, homophobia, body politics, ableism, and so on—but this was the first time I really started to pay attention to the way they fit together, and the first time that I ever entertained the idea that in resisting one, it was vital for me to also resist the others.
And here’s the thing, about activism, about resistance: I had largely been bred to the kind of activism that works just fine for white folks, and it never even occurred to me to question that. I didn’t find out, for example, that the roots of feminism in the US are essentially racist roots until somebody clued me in and I did some digging. The history of women of color in the American feminist movement (said history including up to, oh, today) can make steam shoot out my ears. I won’t go into too much detail, but one illustrative example is that women of color have been continually told by white feminists that there’s no room to address issues of racism (or issues of racist feminists) because sexism has to be dealt with first.
Now, does learning crap like this make me not a feminist anymore? No. It makes me a really angry feminist—even more so than usual. But that’s just one example. I have lots of others, many many examples of the ways in which people of color have been additionally oppressed, dismissed, disenfranchised, discounted or just plain invisibled within the work being done in the areas of feminism, queer activism, class activism etc., but I’m trying not to belabor the point… the point! Right! Once upon a time I had one! Really.
This is basically it: learning about intersectionality changed the way I do activism. For one thing, it made it a whole lot harder, fraught with complexities (granted, this ‘fraught with complexities’ statement is from someone who considers it a grass-roots feminist action to punch out a drunken asshole guy when he’s sexually harassing random women), and basically requiring some real thought, not just the instinct of my lower belly (Cimmerians smash!).
But the part of this that is about faith, well, I’ve got that down. I wholeheartedly believe that a victory on behalf of oppressed white folks which is only fit or structured to or welcoming to or represented by those particular white folks (whether those folks be women or queer or poor or disabled or pinko commie bastards or whatever,) is no real victory at all.
And I want my activism to matter—I want to make a contribution to the kind of victory that we can all get excited about.
NB: This post interacts with only an eensy little bit of intersectionality, which is actually huge and far-reaching and really, really amazing and much, much bigger than the tiny bit of it I’ve talked about here. Also, intersectional theory is… well, it’s just fucking awesome. If I were writing for Schoolhouse Rock, that would be my song topic of choice.
And finally, here's a link to IBARW. Now I shall go back into listening mode...
August 10 2007, 20:26:54 UTC 4 years ago
Who is that in your icon, by the way?
August 10 2007, 20:57:47 UTC 4 years ago
Yes. That would be *exactly* what I'm talking about. GRRRRR!
My icon: that is the lovely and talented Rachel Luttrell as Teyla Emmagen on SGA. There's an episode in which the team leader is enthusing about how they could all be different superheroes, and he tells Teyla "You could be the Invisible Woman!" and she says, totally deadpan and a little threatening, "I am Not Invisible." Brilliant moment.
My turn: who painted your icon?
August 10 2007, 21:39:54 UTC 4 years ago
By the way, you are *most* welcome to stay with us when you make it up to the rainy city. Would be fun!
The icon is Van Gogh's Room at Arles.
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
August 11 2007, 02:05:49 UTC 4 years ago
Not enough to get you out of the corner, but a good post.
August 11 2007, 10:40:30 UTC 4 years ago
October 17 2008, 04:39:37 UTC 3 years ago
October 17 2008, 06:59:57 UTC 3 years ago
August 11 2007, 02:26:19 UTC 4 years ago
I just wanted to be sure to thank you for the post. (If I waited a week, I'd forget to do it. :) )
August 11 2007, 10:42:06 UTC 4 years ago
August 13 2007, 21:33:12 UTC 4 years ago
This is not true in my experience. Perhaps it's the word "continually" that I disagree with, but through many many years of feminism I've seen it constantly in a struggle to understand and respond to issues of race, class, sexuality, etc. I have no doubt that it HAS happened, here and there, but in my personal experience, feminist activism is excruciatingly sensitve to issues of exclusion and discrimination etc. That hasn't always been the case, for sure -- feminists as much as anyone have been liable, in their history, to racism, homophobia, whatever. But the dialog takes place and they work on it, at least in the instances I've seen. Not trying to start a big fight or anything, at all, but I think the "let's you and her fight" potential in that statement is really high.
August 13 2007, 21:57:56 UTC 4 years ago
Undoubtedly so--I do tend towards those types of statements. Still: I stand by it, at least as far as my own experience goes. Even at this present time, I have chosen to move away from the majority of the feminist online community, for this very reason. Unless the community is maintained by a woman or women of color with an explicit anti-racist agenda, the unthinking privilege-steeped racism drives me right 'round the bend, and depresses the hell out of me to boot.
There is also history here of white feminists being unwilling and/or unable to understand the way that sexism can operate very differently within the lives of and upon the bodies of women of color. That the choices and ideals of feminist women of color may differ significantly from the 'typical' choices and ideals of whites. My understanding of the origins of intersectional theory is that it was created specifically to address the needs and concerns of Black feminists, and feminists of color in general, and that that had to happen because their needs weren't being met (or considered) by the white feminist community.
I am not at all looking to discount your experience, and if your experience of feminism has been an inclusive and welcoming one with regard to race, that is of course Of The Good. But my own has not been that way, and the stuff I learned when I started digging was some nasty shit--I'm passionate as all hell about my feminism, but I had to find another way to do it.
August 13 2007, 22:22:49 UTC 4 years ago
I totally understand about the depression and bendroundiness. In high school, reading books like "Look Away, Look Away" etc. etc., I remember that rage and disbelief -- "How can they DO that! How can they stand to lie and be unjust that way!" And so on. And I still don't really get it. I guess I understand making mistakes out of ignorance, but not by freaking *choice*. That and stupidity is where intersectionality would perhaps make a little cross-mark for "go nuclear" in my brain.
Looking back, maybe "inclusive and welcoming" would be a little too perfect a description of what I've seen. More like "listening and trying to get it and fix it". :-)
4 years ago
4 years ago
August 14 2007, 01:08:53 UTC 4 years ago
I think I have to say that its happened much more than here and there. Women of color have been describing their experiences of white feminism as something that excludes their needs, concerns, and voices for decades-- and responding to it accordingly.
August 14 2007, 20:18:52 UTC 4 years ago
August 14 2007, 20:35:34 UTC 4 years ago
Thank you for your kind words, for your support, and for your expansion on this theme. You, as always and ever, Rock On.
August 14 2007, 20:40:33 UTC 4 years ago
4 years ago
August 14 2007, 21:42:18 UTC 4 years ago
August 14 2007, 22:18:40 UTC 4 years ago
::smooches you::
Melis
August 14 2007, 22:18:24 UTC 4 years ago
August 14 2007, 22:31:41 UTC 4 years ago
Also: is your humandesign addy still valid?
4 years ago
4 years ago
August 22 2007, 00:20:50 UTC 4 years ago
I like intersectional analysis; I haven't read any for a while, but the stuff I remember coming across was always smart and useful. Though I never could shake a certain misgiving -- when I read specific analyses, they were always persuasive, but when I though about it in the abstract, it always seemed too -- mathematical, I guess. And I like math! I still think intersectionality is an important and valuable move; I'm just not sure it's the endgame (not that I have anything better to propose).
My experience with activism is that if you don't figure out how you're going to take on issues of race, gender, etc. within your group/movement up front and proactively and collectively, you're in for some painful times all around. If you're wondering why there's so few people of color in the room with you even when you're always talking about how important your issue is for communities of color and how it disproportionately affects "them" -- well, maybe it's time to think about how you're framing and organizing around the issue. And maybe you need to spend some time focusing on your whiteness & privilege as a question and potential problem viz. your activist default/norm/process/structure/culture instead of waiting for "them" to show up and devising yet more "not our fault" excuses or patronizing explanations for "their" persistent absence. And maybe it's time to ask whether and why your message may not be resonating -- may even be alienating or infuriating -- to the people (or, in condescending activist-speak, "the folks") on whose behalf you profess to be working.
["You" in general and not you
And it's still just as easy for me to forget this as it is to rant about it. The best I've gotten to so far is trying to train myself to think, what would this campaign look like if people different from me/us were organizing it? How much of what I'm doing is about my priorities? Are my strategies tailored to my skills and status and style in ways that marginalize or devalue other people's? Who am I talking to, and when am I listening? How are we implicitly or explicitly granting status/influence and recognizing leadership?
I think I can keep training myself to do that, but it's like exercise -- it's still far too easy to find justifications to skip it when I don't feel like it, even though I know how rewarding and even enjoyable it can be when it's become part of my routine.
August 22 2007, 22:33:54 UTC 4 years ago
Thank you for the lovely rant--I sincerely appreciate it :-)
4 years ago
October 10 2007, 14:00:13 UTC 4 years ago
Intersectionality!
It has a name!All my life I've thought that different kinds of oppression are interrelated and linked. I'm really glad to find out that this concept has a name, and doubly glad to read your absolutely awesome post about this. Thank you for this!
October 10 2007, 14:09:31 UTC 4 years ago
Re: Intersectionality!
OMG icon *LOVE*! A-Dorable!And: yeah, it was kind of a stunner for me to twig to the fact that this weird gut instinct I thought was all mine was, in fact, an established branch of social justice and activist thought (I think my first thought was 'well, that saves me a whole lotta time'). Thanks so much for letting me know that you enjoyed the post--I'm so glad it came in handy!
March 16 2008, 23:03:24 UTC 4 years ago
We were suckered
a paradigm that ignores intersectionality is an easy victim for the kind of coalition busting that the wealth and power elites rely on.The fewer people who get intersectionality, the easier it will be to pull off a scam like the current Clinton vs Obama wars. In this case Clinton and Obama fell for it themselves. As did I.
Did y'all fall for it? too.